Throughout history ,financial
crises often follow these asset price bubbles. The
Fed ultimately has responsibility for maintaining the stability of the US
economy, so should the central bank and government do more to prevent
these bubbles from developing in the first place? In my previous post I
outlined how I felt The Fed contributed to the housing bubble and I also
touched on how political influence may make it difficult fopr The Fed to completely cut off
any increase in asset prices. However I do believe that they could have
acted differently in order to limit the boom in housing prices.
The first step (possibly the
most simple and most important) would have been to acknowledge the existence of
a bubble in the first place and at a much earlier stage. Working along with
both the Federal Government and mortgage lenders they could have informed and
educated the general population on the dangers associated with the bubble which
was developing. They could have encouraged more caution on the part of both
lenders and borrowers which may have somewhat curtailed the problem of
irrational behaviour I discussed earlier.
Secondly, as the regulator
they could have issued specific regulations with regard to subprime lending.
They could have specifically targeted the mortgage lending industry with
increased standards which would have to have been met by borrowers. More
specifically, dangerous products such as greater than 100 per cent mortgages
could have been abolished and higher standards with regards to borrower
suitability could have been introduced. Regulation could also have been used to
influence the assets held by banks and their over all exposure to property backed
assets could have been reduced.
Finally, and possibly the most
extreme measure would have been to increase interest rates in an attempt to
directly reduce mortgage borrowing. This step would have reduced to
availability of funds to banks and therefore to individuals. This step however
may also have had negative effects for the wider economy such as small
businesses and therefore would have been unpopular with the Federal Government
and the population.
On his blog (available here)
Professor John Turner of Queens University Belfast recently posted a video of
Adam Posen from the Monetary Policy Committee at The Bank of England discussing
asset price bubbles. Mr Posen argues that it is not possible to tell the difference
between a bull market and an asset price bubble before the bubble bursts and
therefore central banks are not able to take pre-emptive action to deflate a
bubble as this would damage real growth in the economy.
My own opinion at this stage
is that for both practical and political reasons it can be difficult
for central banks to prevent asset price bubbles, none the less, they should be
extremely careful not to encourage bubbles to develop in the first place!
No comments:
Post a Comment